32 Box Office Blockbusters That Actually Suck

32 Box Office Blockbusters That Actually Suck

Movies

Products You May Like

Does tremendous success at the box office always mean a movie is actually good? No, not necessarily. Over the years, there have been countless releases that brought in a ton of cash but were nothing more than big stinkers in terms of cinematic quality. Below is just 32 box office blockbusters that actually suck. And while a lot of these duds are from the past decade or so (which is probably more of an indication of modern Hollywood), there are a few nostalgic ‘90s movies that aren’t that good looking back.

Kevin Costner in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves

(Image credit: Warner Bros.)

Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves (1991)

Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves features one of Alan Rickman’s best performances, but that’s about the only thing this 1991 historical drama has going for it. Robin Hood’s English accent is nowhere to be found, Morgan Freeman’s Azeem Edi Bashir Al Bakir is a poorly aged stereotype, and the pacing is all over the place. Yet, somehow, it made $390 million worldwide, per Box Office Mojo.

View original source here.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Two New Character Options’ Doctor Who Sets Available in UK B&M Stores This Holiday – AwesomeToyBlog
ChatGPT App Gets a New SearchGPT Shortcut on iPhone and iPad
Google Messages Rolls Out Merged Camera and Gallery UI, Adds Image Quality Selection in Beta: Report
Phasing Out Sugar Could Have a Profound Effect on The Planet : ScienceAlert
Matthew McConaughey Explained Why His Roles In Rom-Coms Impacted His Decision To Leave Hollywood And Move To Texas