Federal Ruling Says that AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted

Books

Products You May Like

The latest in the AI debate is a ruling delivered Friday by federal Judge Beryl Howell, which upholds a U.S. Copyright Office finding. The finding — and the federal ruling — both state that artwork created by AI can’t be copyrighted.

This comes as people like CEO of Imagination Engines Stephen Thaler fight for works created by AI to be protected under copyright law. Thaler filed a lawsuit after the U.S. Copyright Office refused his request for artwork created by his computer system to be copyrighted. Thaler believes that AI should be considered “an author where it otherwise meets authorship criteria.” This is despite the fact that AI learns by using other artists’ and writers’ work, uncredited.

Even with this federal ruling, though, works created by AI may still be protected under copyright laws. The U.S. Copyright Office said it would consider each copyright case involving AI individually. Mashable explained that this could be boiled down to whether a work was produced solely by AI or if a human being had a hand in it. If a person is involved, the work could possibly be protected by copyright laws.

Find more news and stories of interest from the book world in Breaking in Books.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Scary Christmas: V. Killer Claus
Mötley Crüe’s Tommy Lee only showers “once a week”, his wife says
iPhone 14, iPhone SE Sales in EU to Be Discontinued Due to Upcoming Regulation: Report
A Complete Unknown Review: Timothée Chalamet Breaks The Biopic Mold (And Made Me A First-Time Fan Of Bob Dylan)
Tyler Doupe’s Top 10 Horror Films of 2024