Daily Geek Report
  • Home
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Games
  • Comics
  • Action Figures/ Toys
  • Movies
  • Books
  • Horror
  • Television
  • Music
  • Contact
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
Skip to content
Daily Geek Report
The #1 Source For All Things Geek
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Games
  • Comics
  • Action Figures/ Toys
  • Movies
  • Books
  • Horror
  • Television
  • Music
  • Contact
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

We’re Either Suspiciously Lucky, or There Really Are Many Universes Out There

March 18, 2023 by admin 0 Comments

Science

Products You May Like

Ads by Amazon
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Pinterest
Share on LinkedIn

It’s easy to envisage other universes, governed by slightly different laws of physics, in which no intelligent life, nor indeed any kind of organized complex systems, could arise. Should we therefore be surprised that a universe exists in which we were able to emerge?

That’s a question physicists including me have tried to answer for decades. But it is proving difficult.

Although we can confidently trace cosmic history back to one second after the Big Bang, what happened before is harder to gauge. Our accelerators simply can’t produce enough energy to replicate the extreme conditions that prevailed in the first nanosecond.

But we expect that it’s in that first tiny fraction of a second that the key features of our Universe were imprinted.

The conditions of the Universe can be described through its “fundamental constants” – fixed quantities in nature, such as the gravitational constant (called G) or the speed of light (called C). There are about 30 of these representing the sizes and strengths of parameters such as particle masses, forces or the Universe’s expansion.

But our theories don’t explain what values these constants should have. Instead, we have to measure them and plug their values into our equations to accurately describe nature.

The values of the constants are in the range that allows complex systems such as stars, planets, carbon and ultimately humans to evolve. Physicists have discovered that if we tweaked some of these parameters by just a few percent, it would render our Universe lifeless.

The fact that life exists therefore takes some explaining.

Some argue it is just a lucky coincidence. An alternative explanation, however, is that we live in a multiverse, containing domains with different physical laws and values of fundamental constants.

Most might be wholly unsuitable for life. But a few should, statistically speaking, be life-friendly.

Impending revolution?

What is the extent of physical reality? We’re confident that it’s more extensive than the domain that astronomers can ever observe, even in principle.

That domain is definitely finite. That’s essentially because, like on the ocean, there’s a horizon that we can’t see beyond. And just as we don’t think the ocean stops just beyond our horizon, we expect galaxies beyond the limit of our observable Universe.

In our accelerating Universe, our remote descendants will also never be able to observe them.

Most physicists would agree there are galaxies that we can’t ever see, and that these outnumber the ones we can observe. If they stretched far enough, then everything we could ever imagine happening may be repeated over and over. Far beyond the horizon, we could all have avatars.

This vast (and mainly unobservable) domain would be the aftermath of “our” Big Bang – and would probably be governed by the same physical laws that prevail in the parts of the universe we can observe. But was our Big Bang the only one?

The theory of inflation, which suggests that the early Universe underwent a period when it doubled in size every trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second has genuine observational support. It accounts for why the Universe is so large and smooth, except for fluctuations and ripples that are the “seeds” for galaxy formation.

But physicists including Andrei Linde have shown that, under some specific but plausible assumptions about the uncertain physics at this ancient era, there would be an “eternal” production of Big Bangs – each giving rise to a new universe.

String theory, which is an attempt to unify gravity with the laws of microphysics, conjectures everything in the Universe is made up of tiny, vibrating strings. But it makes the assumption that there are more dimensions than the ones we experience.

These extra dimensions, it suggests, are compacted so tightly together that we don’t notice them all. And each type of compactification could create a universe with different microphysics – so other Big Bangs, when they cool down, could be governed by different laws.

The “laws of nature” may therefore, in this still grander perspective, be local by-laws governing our own cosmic patch.

If physical reality is like this, then there’s a real motivation to explore “counterfactual” universes – places with different gravity, different physics and so forth – to explore what range or parameters would allow complexity to emerge, and which would lead to sterile or “stillborn” cosmos.

Excitingly, this is ongoing, with recent research suggesting you could imagine universes that are even more friendly to life than our own. Most “tweakings” of the physical constants, however, would render a universe stillborn.

That said, some don’t like the concept of the multiverse. They worry it would render the hope for a fundamental theory to explain the constants as vain as Kepler’s numerological quest to relate planetary orbits to nested platonic solids.

But our preferences are irrelevant to the way physical reality actually is – so we should surely be open minded to the possibility of an imminent grand cosmological revolution.

First we had the Copernican realization that the Earth wasn’t the center of the Solar System – it revolves around the Sun. Then we realized that there are zillions of planetary systems in our galaxy, and that there are zillions of galaxies in our observable universe.

So could it be that our observable domain – indeed our Big Bang – is a tiny part of a far larger and possibly diverse ensemble?

Physics or metaphysics?

How do we know just how atypical our Universe is? To answer that we need to work out the probabilities of each combination of constants. And that’s a can of worms that we can’t yet open – it will have to await huge theoretical advances.

We don’t ultimately know if there are other Big Bangs. But they’re not just metaphysics. We might one day have reasons to believe that they exist.

Specifically, if we had a theory that described physics under the extreme conditions of the ultra-early Big Bang – and if that theory had been corroborated in other ways, for instance by deriving some unexplained parameters in the standard model of particle physics – then if it predicted multiple Big Bangs, we should take it seriously.

Critics sometimes argue that the multiverse is unscientific because we can’t ever observe other universes. But I disagree. We can’t observe the interior of black holes, but we believe what physicist Roger Penrose says about what happens there – his theory has gained credibility by agreeing with many things we can observe.

About 15 years ago, I was on a panel at Stanford where we were asked how seriously we took the multiverse concept – on the scale “would you bet your goldfish, your dog, or your life” on it.

I said I was nearly at the dog level. Linde said he’d almost bet his life. Later, on being told this, physicist Steven Weinberg said he’d “happily bet Martin Rees’ dog and Andrei Linde’s life”.

Sadly, I suspect Linde, my dog and I will all be dead before we have an answer.

Indeed, we can’t even be sure we’d understand the answer – just as quantum theory is too difficult for monkeys. It’s conceivable that machine intelligence could explore the geometrical intricacies of some string theories and spew out, for instance, some generic features of the standard model. We’d then have confidence in the theory and take its other predictions seriously.

But we’d never have the “aha” insight moment that’s the greatest satisfaction for a theorist. Physical reality at its deepest level could be so profound that its elucidation would have to await posthuman species – depressing or exhilarating as that may be, according to taste.

But it’s no reason to dismiss the multiverse as unscientific.The Conversation

Martin Rees, Emeritus Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics, University of Cambridge

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

This article was originally published by Sciencealert.com. Read the original article here.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Pinterest
Share on LinkedIn

Products You May Like

Ads by Amazon

Articles You May Like

‘Titanic’ To Set Sail For China In 25th Anniversary Rerelease
‘Million Dollar Listing’ Star Josh Altman Blasts L.A.’s New Mansion Tax
Saliva Guitarist Wayne Swinny Dead at 59 After Brain Hemorrhage
Andrew Lloyd Webber Super Chill About King Charles’ Coronation Music
A24 Acquires Talking Heads 1984 Concert Film ‘Stop Making Sense’, Will Restore In 4K For Theatrical Release

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Box

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Daily Geek Report

Find out what you are missing. Learn about Cryptocurrency.

Recent Articles

  • Watch Caroline Polachek Perform “Welcome to My Island” on Fallon
  • Rob Zombie Recording New ‘House of 1000 Corpses’ Commentary Track 20 Years Later; Available Next Month
  • Erik Lomis Remembered By Hollywood Colleagues And Friends: “A Part Of The Industry Has Died With Him Today”, Barbara Broccoli Says
  • ATTACK ON TITAN Publisher Kodansha Launching Manga App
  • ‘Storage Wars’ Gunter Nezhoda Dead at 67
  • Tasmanian Tiger ‘Probably’ Survived to 1980s or Even Later, Study Claims
  • Nintendo Switch firmware updated to Version 16.0.1 (patch notes)
  • Europe tools up for the repairable future
  • Saliva Guitarist Wayne Swinny Dead at 59 After Brain Hemorrhage
  • ‘Five Nights at Freddy’s’ Movie Adds Elizabeth Lail to the Cast
Ads by Amazon

Tech

  • Europe tools up for the repairable future
  • Amazon expands Fire TV lineup with more QLED models, entry-level 2-Series TVs and new markets
  • CodiumAI is using generative AI to help developers build code logic tests automatically
  • Kakao Mobility picks up ‘super app’ startup Splyt, once backed by SoftBank and Grab
  • Foiled again: Candela raises another $20M to set course for the future of ferries
  • Berlin’s Monite raises $5M seed for its embedded B2B payments platform
  • The Monarch could be the next big thing in Braille
Ads by Amazon

Action Figures / Toys

  • REVIEW: Marvel Select Super Skrull Figure (Diamond Select Toys 2023)
  • Spider-Man Marvel Legends 2023 Figures Up for Order! Rose! Ben Reilly! Elektra Daredevil!
  • X-Men Marvel Legends Longshot Retro Series Figure Review (Hasbro 2023)
  • Marvel Legends Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 Movie Figures Up for Order! Adam Warlock! Cosmo Build-A-Figure!
  • Marvel Legends Ant-Man Quantumania Figures Up for Order! Cassie Lang BAF Series!
  • REVIEW: Marvel Legends Shuri Black Panther Wakanda Forever Movie Figure
  • Marvel Legends 2023: Franklin/Valeria Richards! Yondu! PS5 Spider-Man! Squadron Supreme!

Categories

  • Action Figures/ Toys
  • Books
  • Comics
  • Events
  • Games
  • Horror
  • Interviews
  • Movies
  • Music
  • News
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Television
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Action Figures/ Toys
  • Books
  • Comics
  • Events
  • Games
  • Horror
  • Interviews
  • Movies
  • Music
  • News
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Television
  • Uncategorized

Useful Links

  • Contact us
  • About us
  • Amazon Disclaimer
  • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Recent Articles

  • Watch Caroline Polachek Perform “Welcome to My Island” on Fallon
  • Rob Zombie Recording New ‘House of 1000 Corpses’ Commentary Track 20 Years Later; Available Next Month
  • Erik Lomis Remembered By Hollywood Colleagues And Friends: “A Part Of The Industry Has Died With Him Today”, Barbara Broccoli Says
  • ATTACK ON TITAN Publisher Kodansha Launching Manga App
  • ‘Storage Wars’ Gunter Nezhoda Dead at 67

Copyright © 2023 by Daily Geek Report. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Powered by WordPress using DisruptPress Theme.